Tenkara TalkTenkara Talk
Tenkara Talk
a tenkara fly fishing blog
Search TenkaraTalk
  • Home
  • Tenkara Gear
    • Tenkara Rods
    • Tenkara Lines
    • Flies
    • Line Holders & Spools
    • Fly Boxes
    • Nets
    • Packs, Organization & Storage
    • Clothing & Accessories
    • Wading Gear
  • How-To & Resources
    • What is Tenkara?
    • Tenkara 101
    • Presentation Techniques
    • Streamcraft
    • Tenkara Videos
    • Fly Tying
    • Knots
    • DIY & Hacks
    • Warmwater Tenkara
    • Books & Media
  • News & Fun
    • Trip Reports
    • Interviews
    • Philosophy
    • Humor
    • Art
    • Tenkara News
    • Events
  • Tenkara Links
  • About Me
  • Contact
FacebookTwitterYouTubePinterestInstagram
  • Home
  • Tenkara Gear
    • Tenkara Rods
    • Tenkara Lines
    • Flies
    • Line Holders & Spools
    • Fly Boxes
    • Nets
    • Packs, Organization & Storage
    • Clothing & Accessories
    • Wading Gear
  • How-To & Resources
    • What is Tenkara?
    • Tenkara 101
    • Presentation Techniques
    • Streamcraft
    • Tenkara Videos
    • Fly Tying
    • Knots
    • DIY & Hacks
    • Warmwater Tenkara
    • Books & Media
  • News & Fun
    • Trip Reports
    • Interviews
    • Philosophy
    • Humor
    • Art
    • Tenkara News
    • Events
  • Tenkara Links
  • About Me
  • Contact

Tenkara Level Line Conversion Chart

March 29, 201315 CommentsTenkara 101By Jason Klass

Math is definitely not my strong point but I did a little to try to answer some questions I’ve been getting about the Japanese line rating system for fluorocarbon level lines and what it translates to in diameter. Please note:  lb. test is irrelevant.  Diameter matters more for turnover than test.  And, test per diameter varies from company to company so I narrowed it down to the most relevant and popular diameters for tenkara.  Also keep in mind that these are approximations that seem to have consensus.  But some companies’ ratings might slightly vary outside these diameters.  Anything outside this range is specialty and I don’t think applies to most of us so I didn’t include it. I hope this helps.

tenkaratenkara line charttenkara line diameterstenkara line sizes
About the author

Jason Klass

Jason is an avid fly angler and backpacker. As a former fly fishing guide originally from Western New York, he moved to Colorado and became an early adopter of tenkara which perfectly suited the small, high altitude streams and lakes there. He has not fished a Western-style fly rod for trout since.

Like this article? You might also like these ...
Advantages of tying your own flies
5 Good Reasons to Tie Your Own Flies
February 4, 2020
How to Attach Tippet to a Tenkara Level Line
How to Tie Tippet to a Tenkara Level Line
February 17, 2019
How to Attach Any Line to a Tenkara Rod
How to Tie ANY Line to a Tenkara Rod
December 15, 2018
Tenkara Casting vs. Western Fly Fishing
Western vs. Tenkara: Presentation Efficiency
November 6, 2018
Tenkara Fishing
How to Avoid Wind Drag in Tenkara Presentations
October 19, 2018
tenkara
6 Things That Will Frustrate You About Tenkara (And What To Do About It)
May 13, 2017
15 Comments
  1. March 30, 2013 at 9:10 am
    David

    Hello – Here is another good source for choosing line and tippet diameter sizes: http://www.letsflyfish.com/fishing_flies_fly_lines.htm

  2. March 30, 2013 at 9:34 am
    Lynn David

    I had a little bit different with Japanese size lines 3 & 3.5.

    Japan — mm. — inches – Tippet* – Lb. Test**
    ——————————————————
    # 6 = .405mm = .0159″ 25 lb

    # 5 = .370mm = .0146″ 20 lb

    # 4 = .330mm = .013″ 16 lb

    # 3.5 = .310mm = .0122″ 14 lb

    # 3 = .285mm = .011″ 0X 12 lb

    # 2.5 = .260mm = .010″ 1X 10 lb

    # 2 = .235mm = .009″ 2X 8 lb

  3. March 30, 2013 at 10:02 am
    Jason Klass

    Hi Lynn, well, like I said, these are approximations that will vary by manufacturer. The intent was just to give people a rough idea of the diameters to looks for if they’re searching for fluorocarbon that isn’t specifically marketed as “tenkara” line.

  4. March 30, 2013 at 10:06 am
    Jason Klass

    Good chart. Although I would disagree with some of their choices. For example, to me, 4X on a #16 hook is way too heavy. I would use 5X or 6X. Same with 5X on a #18. I would use 6X or smaller. But, to each their own.

  5. March 30, 2013 at 12:29 pm
    Bob Foresti

    …gotta agree with you there….4X is pretty stiff and will present as such with small flies….thin and flexible will better assist one with fooling the wary trout…

  6. March 30, 2013 at 3:57 pm
    thetroutfly

    Interesting Jason, I was just writing about lines over at tenkara corner today. I haven’t really fished a line below what might be considered a #3, I recommended too that anglers concentrate on diameter rather than #ratings and lb test. I’ve been testing various lines since I started tenkara fishing and it’s very interesting to experiment.

  7. March 30, 2013 at 4:16 pm
    Joe Egry

    For Western fly fishing, I usually divide the size of the fly by 3 to determine which tippet to use, i.e., Size 12 = 4X, Size 16 = 5X, Size 18 = 6X, etc. For Tenkara I just use 5X and call it good.

  8. March 30, 2013 at 6:17 pm
    Jason Klass

    Hey Bob, yes, that article seems to focus on turnover more than presentation. I would argue that once you get down below a size #14 or #16 fly, turnover is irrelevant but tippet size starts to matter exponentially.

  9. March 31, 2013 at 2:03 am
    David

    My understanding is that the Japanese only have an industry standard for nylon line. Specifically for 1号 = .165mm in diameter. Actually they measure line by weight. The unit of measure is the denier(grams/9000m) or the decitex(dtex) (grams/10000m) For nylon 1号, dtex = 244. The .165 mm diameter is calculated from this weight per length and specific gravity of their line. Everything else is derived from the standard for 号1. If 10,000m of 1号 line weights more than 244g then the line is > .165 mm in diameter. The formula is

    Diameter = {square root of [dtex/(10,000 x 1.14 x Pi)]} x 2. Where 1.14 is the specific gravity of nylon line.

    Fluorocarbon, PE line etc., only more or less follow, the standard for nylon line. SG-Fluorocarbon 1.78, dtex= 380. High density FC SG = 1.85 & dtex = 394. I’m sure different line makers have variations on these numbers. The 号 system is almost as vague as the flex index ratio numbers used for rods. But 1号 is the anchor point.

    Thumb rules for nylon line; double the 号 number and the dtex doubles, and the diameter increases by x 1.41. example 2号 = .233mm and dtex = 488. 4号 = .328mm rounded to .330 and dtex = 276.

    Because of the way the Japanese calculate an average test strength based on cross sectional area of the line given in kg you can’t really convert kg to Lbs test by x 2.2 and compare it directly to lbs test as specified for American lb test line because they use different measuring standards. The American lb test is supposed to be maximum lbs vs Japanese average kg.

    The standard for 1号 line goes back in history to how silk line was measured and when the nylon standard was made it applied only to nylon line because FC, PE , vectran, dyneema etc had not yet been invented. And I guess they don’t want the expense of writing new standards that includes the new type line materials, being happy to just reference the nylon line standard.

  10. March 31, 2013 at 2:17 am
    David

    Opps, sorry a typo. Nylon 4号 dtex = 976. Not 276. And 976 will calculate a line diameter of .330.

  11. April 19, 2013 at 10:23 am
    Karl Kavon

    I have used Cabela’s No-Vis Fluorocarbon Premium Fishing Line

    for leader construction quite successfully for years, and also

    for level and tapered FC Tenkara lines more recently. One of the

    appealing things about this line is its cost, $12.99 for a 200

    Yard spool of the 4, 6 and 8 Lb test ratings, which is

    comparable to the the cost of 25 yards of FC tippet material

    from many of the fly fishing brand makers.

    I prefer the TenkaraBum HiVis Orange Sunline in the #3 line size

    (10 Lb. test) to the Cabelas line as it is more supple and

    easier to straighten than the Cabelas line is in that weight.

    But here are the diameters given for the 4, 6, 8 and 10 Lb. test lines so you can compare them to Jason’s T-line Chart.

    4 Lb. test DIA. .006″ – #.5 T-line ? equivalent – ?

    6 Lb. test DIA. .008″ – # 1 T-line equivalent – ?

    8 Lb. test DIA. .009″ – # 2 T-line equivalent – .009 per JK

    10 Lb. test DIA. .011″ – # 3 T-line equivalent – .012 per JK

    Which I believe compares pretty favorably with the T-line diameter measurements for thickness. The Cabela’s Premium Fishing line also has enough body to cast well on T-rods. The visibility sucks but where you are going to sub size #3 lines, I would think you would want all the stealth you can get.

  12. April 19, 2013 at 11:09 am
    Jason Klass

    Hi Karl,
    As always, great information and I think you make a good point about light clear lines and stealth. I wonder if in those situations it would make sense to use a high vis Tenkara line with a length of lighter clear fluorocarbon at the end.

  13. April 19, 2013 at 12:25 pm
    Karl Kavon

    Jason,

    I have tried that and it works well. What it amounts to is a cross between a level FC and a tapered FC lines. You get all the visibility and most of the casting muscle you get with a level FC line, but with the more delicate presentations and the stealth of a No-Vis Hand-Tied Tapered FC line close to the fish. Give it a try and see what you think.

    Since sub #3 lines are difficult to get at present, the Cabela’s Fluorocarbon No-Vis 100% Fluorocarbon Premium Fishing Line offers an alternative source at a reasonable price for what you get.

  14. April 19, 2013 at 12:31 pm
    Karl Kavon

    Just to be sure there is no confusion as Cabela’s has so many different types of lines that they stock, Here is a link to the line mentioned above: http://www.cabelas.com/product/Cabelas-No-Vis8482-Fluorocarbon-Line-200-Yards/702377.uts?Ntk=AllProducts&searchPath=%2Fcatalog%2Fsearch.cmd%3Fform_state%3DsearchForm%26N%3D0%26fsch%3Dtrue%26Ntk%3DAllProducts%26Ntt%3DCabela%2527s%2BNo-Vis%2BFluorocarbon%2BLine%2B200%26x%3D11%26y%3D8%26WTz_l%3DHeader%253BSearch-All%2BProducts&Ntt=Cabela%27s+No-Vis+Fluorocarbon+Line+200&WTz_l=Header%3BSearch-All+Products

  15. April 19, 2013 at 1:06 pm
    Jason Klass

    Thanks Karl!

Leave Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

clear formSubmit

About Me

Jason Klass is a former fly fishing guide & casting instructor based in Colorado. He was an early adopter of tenkara in the West and has been fishing the method for a variety of species since 2009. Read more >>

TenkaraTalk Sponsors
Tenkara USA   Dragontail Tenkara     TAO Tenkara   Tenkara Tanuki Tenkara Fisher
Search by Category
Send Jason an Email
Search TenkaraTalk
Tenkara Talk Archives
Tenkara + Backpacking!
Is there any other sport that goes better with tenkara than hiking and backpacking? Be sure to also check out my ultralight and DIY backpacking gear blog.

Tenkara and Backpacking
Latest Posts
  • Tenkara Book
    Tenkara Today Book Review
    November 7, 2020
  • Tenkara Tanuki Retractor
    Tenkara Tanuki Retractor
    October 28, 2020
  • Hoo Rag
    The Hoo Rag
    September 23, 2020
© 2019 | TenkaraTalk by Jason Klass | All rights reserved